The New York Jets released Tim Tebow today after one season of very little playing time. Was this just another action by “the capital of quick-fix bonehead decisions”1 or was it because they were tired of the “circus” surrounding Tebow as ESPN’s Skip Bayless mentioned this morning?
The Jets made their decision despite granting Tebow just 71 snaps during the regular season. This isn’t the time to rehash the lack of wisdom in the Jets’ early plan to use him at positions other than quarterback. However, as Skip pointed out, at least twelve NFL teams would have been better off with Tebow as the starting qb. His winning ways as a Broncos are proof. A look at their recent 6-10 season during which they managed only 17 points per game strongly suggests that NYJ was one of that group which would have benefitted with him in the starting leadership role.
So why the early Tebow exit? Back to the previously mentioned “circus.” Ever since his emergence on the national sports scene, Tim’s outward expressions of his Christian faith have drawn undue attention. The news media feels obligated to highlight him whenever he makes a quick prayer on the sidelines.2 However, their attention is not one of quiet admiration, but rather a disdain for someone who dares to buck the status quo in our post-Christian society. It has the mistaken notion that the practice of one’s faith is to be confined to church buildings.3 Another likely source of their irritation is that he is known to be living a chaste, single life.4 It’s difficult to push moral relativism when another true Christian becomes successful.
It’s disturbing that, in a country known for its glorification of individualistic success, it punishes the individual who doesn’t conform to society’s formula for eternal doom.
1 – Mike Lupica, New York Daily News sports columnist and radio commentator, on ESPN today
2 – And despite what many continue to believe, he doesn’t pray for victory over his opponent, but rather to do his best and to accept the outcome willingly.
3 – It is this state-over-church philosophy which spawns the ridiculously restrictive definition of what constitutes a religious organization when attempting to force implementation of the HHS mandate.
4 – “Living the Abstinent New York Lifestyle,” Bob Tedeschi, New York Times, 8/22/2012. While not available for comment, a Tebow photo and a reference to his well-known morality was mentioned.
Thanks for Seeing the Light, ESPN
And thanks to the Ghosts of Christmas Ads Past, Present and Future for their quick response to Wednesday night’s revelation that ESPN had rejected a Christmas ad from a charitable organization. The group, based in St. Louis, is raising funds for children who must be in hospitals throughout the Christmas season. Unfortunately, they had included non-sports terms such as “Jesus’ birthday” and “God’s healing power.” Heavens to Male-Enhancement!
But, Bill O’Reilly’s audience was informed on Thursday evening that ESPN had reversed its decision and would accept the original ad with the religious terms instead of the altered one submitted in its place.
Regardless of whether it was the aforementioned ghosts making a sudden appearance last night in Bristol, CT or perhaps a realization that its audience is a little more advanced than it assumed, there is relief in Mudville that the right thing was done ultimately. Sports fans of faith appreciate your willingness to correct a mistake, ESPN, and we hope it was a learning experience for the media world.1
1 – and a learning experience for a certain marketing consultant. Early in Thursday’s show before the reversal was announced, Peter Shankman declared emphatically that “ESPN watchers don’t care” about this issue. Perhaps he’ll learn someday, too.
Share this: